
Source: https://eba.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Practical_Steps_for_Business_2026.pdf

Ukraine is launching a special mechanism for the controlled export of Ukrainian weapons and defence technologies to partner countries under the Drone Deal format. The new rules are intended to create a more predictable model for Ukrainian defence manufacturers to enter international markets, while preserving the priority of meeting the needs of Ukraine’s Defence Forces.
The introduction of this mechanism forms part of a broader state policy aimed at developing Ukraine’s defence-industrial complex, attracting additional financial resources, scaling up production, and strengthening international defence cooperation. In this context, the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine has previously emphasised that controlled export should be applied only provided that the unconditional priority of the needs of the security and defence sector is maintained.
Overview of the Changes: What the New Mechanism Provides For
The policy does not provide for the removal of export restrictions but instead introduces a special controlled regime under which the state will retain decisive influence over the key parameters of export: the list of permitted goods and technologies, the range of partner countries, the terms of supply, and the subsequent use of Ukrainian defence products.
Export will be permitted to designated partner countries under the Drone Deal format. Under this policy, manufacturers will be able to work with them directly. At the same time, each contract will be reviewed both from the perspective of Ukraine’s defence needs and in terms of technology control.
Among the key features of the new mechanism, several important points can be highlighted:
The new mechanism should also be considered separately in connection with the Defence City regime (see also: “Law on special legal regime for defence industry enterprises ‘Defence City’ has been adopted”). For defence industry manufacturers that have obtained or plan to obtain Defence City resident status, controlled export may become an additional element of a broader regulatory model combining special tax, customs, currency control, and export control conditions with the possibility of expanding production and developing international defence cooperation.
Export as a tool for financing the defence industry
One of the key ideas of the mechanism is to make export not only a source of revenue for businesses, but also a tool for supporting the entire industry.
Part of the funds from export contracts will be allocated to a special fund: 20% from the export of finished products and technologies, and 30% from the export of components. In this way, the state is effectively integrating export into the financing model of the defence industry.
For companies, this means that an export contract should immediately be viewed more broadly than an ordinary foreign economic transaction. The contributions will affect the economics of the deal, from pricing to payment structure and financial planning.
Priority of defence needs
The opening of export opportunities does not create an automatic right to export: the state will retain the ability to refuse approval of a transaction.
If the products are needed by the Defence Forces or are included in the list of critical goods, an export permit may not be granted. Lists of such goods will be formed and regularly updated, and the range of countries with which such transactions are possible will also be determined.
For businesses, this means that the risk of refusal to approve an export should be taken into account as part of the regulatory model. Therefore, already at the stage of negotiations with a foreign partner, it is advisable to assess not only the commercial parameters of the contract, but also the potential sensitivity of the products for the state and the needs of the security and defence sector.
Accelerated process without reducing oversight
The declared timeline for reviewing applications up to 30 days should be noted separately. If this timeline is observed in practice, it may increase the predictability of the export process for Ukrainian manufacturers and their foreign counterparties.
At the same time, speed does not mean simplified requirements. End-user verification, compliance with export control rules, and sanctions compliance will remain in place.
Therefore, companies should prepare in advance by having a clearly described product, confirmed production capabilities, a transparent ownership structure, and a clear model for the use of technologies.
Intellectual property and re-export control
A separate focus of the mechanism is the protection of Ukrainian technologies. The transfer of technologies is permitted, but without the assignment of intellectual property rights and with clear restrictions on their use.
Re-export or transfer to third parties is possible only with the approval of the Ukrainian side. If products created on the basis of Ukrainian technologies are subsequently sold to other countries, part of their value must also be transferred to the budget.
In this model, intellectual property becomes not merely a technical contractual issue, but one of the central elements in structuring export contracts in the defence industry.
It is particularly important to:
What this means for manufacturers
The new mechanism creates real opportunities for Ukrainian companies, from scaling up production to entering new markets and attracting investment.
At the same time, it also raises the requirements for businesses’ overall preparedness. Participation in such export operations requires not only a product, but also a well-established legal and compliance infrastructure.
Before entering export markets, companies should check:
Key takeaways for the defence market
The controlled export mechanism is an attempt to balance between two objectives: giving businesses an opportunity to grow while maintaining full control over critical resources.
Success in export markets will depend not only on the technological level of the products, but also on how prepared the company is to operate under enhanced regulatory oversight, properly structure export contracts, confirm its production capabilities, and ensure the protection of defence technologies.

What happened to the transport sector as a result of the Ukraine Recovery Conference URC2026 held in Gdansk, Poland.
The Ukraine Recovery Conference URC2026 held this year in Gdansk is over. Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko, head of our delegation after long discussions, stated that Ukraine managed to sign 160 agreements in the amount over 10 billion EUR during two days of work in Poland.
Head of the Government highlighted the following key results: first of all, 3.2 billion EUR to be received by Ukraine as the first tranche of the new EU financial instrument. The agreement with the World Bank provides allocation of 3.4 billion USD. 140 million EUR will be aimed at housing programs. Prime Minister also announced launching the European Flagship Fund for Reconstruction of Ukraine, creation of the Ukraine Transport Support Fund and an agreement with EIB on restoration and protection of roads in frontline regions. She noted, new partnerships in defense and power supply industries are also planned in the future.
Traditionally, in the framework of the Ukraine Recovery Conference and on site, the parties focus on key priorities for reconstruction, launching community resilience plans and attracting financing for infrastructure projects. At the start of URC2026, Ukraine announced its intention to present a portfolio of projects, which included, in particular, over 530 community and regional projects, as well as new public-private partnership projects in housing, infrastructure restoration and logistics development. The Ministry of Community and Territorial Development also reported that this year, for the first time, an Infrastructure Platform will be held in the framework of the Ukraine Recovery Conference.
Results of preliminary selection in the framework of concession of the First and Container Terminals of the Chornomorsk Sea Port
On the eve of URC2026, the Ministry of Development and Trade of Ukraine, in cooperation with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Finance Corporation, presented to international investors in Gdansk the project of concession of the ferry terminal at the Chornomorsk Sea Port.
Representatives of international and Ukrainian companies, including port operators, business associations and international financial organizations attended the event.
Key parameters of the project presented in the framework of report remained unchanged: a terminal concession for 35 years; at least 40 million USD of investment throughout the entire concession period, maintaining throughput capacity at the level of ca. 2 million MT of cargo each year with the potential for further growth, annual concession payments to the state budget, preservation of existing jobs and creation of new ones.
Oleksii Kuleba, the Deputy Prime Minister for the Restoration of Ukraine – Minister of Community and Territorial Development, stated, “Restoration of Ukraine is impossible without attracting private capital. The scale of destruction caused by russian army to Ukrainian infrastructure requires new approaches to financing and development. That is why we are forming a systematic portfolio of public-private partnership projects and creating clear and transparent conditions for investors. Concession of the ferry terminal in Chornomorsk is one more signal to international business that Ukraine is ready for partnership and joint implementation of strategic infrastructure projects”.
During presentation of the ferry terminal, it was emphasized that this stage is a continuation of work on launching concession projects at the Chornomorsk Sea Port. They say, previously the Ministry of Development initiated concession of the First (Universal) Port Terminal and such proposal has already aroused significant interest from international operators. The relevant ministry states that now such project is at the stage of competitive dialogue. Participants shall submit their proposals on key project parameters – conditions for launching the concession, investment commitments, approaches to managing key risks. The results of this stage will form the final version of the concession agreement and instructions for submitting legally binding proposals.
During URC2026, Oleksii Kuleba announced the results of preliminary selection of applicants in the framework of the concession project of the First and Container Terminals at the Chornomorsk Sea Port. He reported, under the results of prequalification stage completed in early April, four applicants were admitted to further participation in the competitive dialogue, namely: APM Terminals B.V., Mariner and TAS consortium, Yilport Holding Anonim Şirketi, Abu Dhabi Ports Company PJSC and SKF Holdings UK LTD consortium.
The Deputy Prime Minister noted that Ukraine has already created the required legislative conditions for launching public-private partnership (PPP) projects, developed risk-sharing mechanisms and formed clear rules of cooperation for international investors. This allows businesses to evaluate Ukrainian infrastructure projects not only through the prism of risks, but also as long-term investment opportunities.
Hereby we remind that concession of the First and Container Terminals at the Chornomorsk Sea Port is the first public-private partnership project in the port industry to be implemented after the outbreak of a full-scale war. This is potentially the largest investment in the history of Ukrainian sea ports, which should attract hundreds of millions US dollars of investment and provide over 1.1 billion USD in revenues to the state and local budgets (throughout all years of the agreement validity term).
Not only Chornomorsk
However, the ferry terminal concession was only part of the PPP portfolio presented by the Ministry of Development in the framework of URC2026. In total, it included over 30 projects related to transport, port, railway, road and municipal infrastructure at aggregate cost of ca. 5 billion USD. 15 projects are of priority for launch in 2026.
Oleksii Kuleba noted that priority projects included the following:
– Concession of the Ferry Terminal at the Chornomorsk Sea Port;
– Concession of the Second Terminal at the Chornomorsk Sea Port;
– Northern bypass of Lviv city;
– Border road corridor M-09 / M-10 / M-11;
– Modernization of the Transport Corridor Yagodyn – Kovel – Lutsk (Motorways M-07 / M-19);
– Reconstruction of the Transport Corridor M-15 Odesa – Reni;
– Construction of 10 Service Zones on motorways of international importance;
– Concession of the Sknyliv Intermodal Hub of JSC “Ukrzaliznytsia”;
– Concession of Kyiv Central Railway Station Complex;
– Concession of Lviv Railway Station Complex;
– Concession of Odesa Railway Station Complex;
– Reconstruction and technical modernization of the Kaidatska Pumping & Filtering Station (Dnipro city),
– Construction of a new line of wastewater treatment facilities in the Uzhgorod;
– Reconstruction of water supply and drainage systems in Khust (Zakarpatska region).
Road and bridge repair, development of border infrastructure
The Ministry of Community and Territorial Development reported on important agreements based on the results of URC 2026. In particular, they reported on signing an agreement with EIB, which will provide over 470 million EUR for restoration of critical infrastructure and business support.
Road and bridge repair, development of border infrastructure aimed to strengthen ties with the EU – that was included in the list of key areas of financing in the framework of such agreement. 96 million EUR have been allocated to this area. In the framework of such agreement, a little more amount (i.e. 100 million EUR) will be aimed only at the pilot program of modern social housing in five cities of Ukraine for IDPs and young professionals.
The Ministry of Finance reported that both Ukraine and the World Bank in Gdansk signed agreements for 3.39 billion USD in order to support the state budget and to continue key reforms.
Such financing package provides that 1.4 billion USD will be spent on development policy, i.e. loan in which 500 million USD will be provided to us under the guarantee of the United Kingdom, while 540 million USD dollars will be secured by Japan.
The Ministry of Finance reported that by late June 2026, Ukraine should receive in aggregate 3.35 billion USD to the general fund of the state budget. Such funds will be directed to supporting macro-financial stability and financing priority budget expenditures. One more share amounting to 40 million USD will be used to capitalize interest.
Among the interesting things there are prospects for localizing helicopter production in Ukraine with the American company Bell Helicopters. The Ministry of Economy called this direction as “having the potential for development of industry, technologies and creation of new jobs”.
What was requested for railway
Oleksii Balesta, the Deputy Minister of Community and Territorial Development, reported that Ukraine received from the World Bank a grant for 10 million USD aimed to strengthen protection and restoration of JSC “Ukrzaliznytsia”.
He noted, a separate railway panel was held in Gdansk for the first time within the URC. During the discussion, clear and positive signals were heard for Ukraine; he emphasized, Europe understands that railways, transport and critical infrastructure concern not only logistics, but also security and stability of the entire continent.
Meantime, the Deputy Minister informed that Ukraine signed an agreement with Sweden for 1 million EUR for the first steps in implementing the European ERTMS rail traffic management system.
In the framework of G2G meeting with representatives of Switzerland, special attention was drawn to finalization of the agreement on providing support in order to strengthen stability of various sectors. Part of the funds in the framework of this project will be allocated for supply of high-tech track equipment for JSC “Ukrzaliznytsia”.
The Ukrainian delegation in Gdansk spoke with Magda Kopczynska, the Director General for Mobility and Transport of the European Commission, about possible solutions for financing projects that enhance sustainability of the Ukrainian railway and its integration with the EU transport system. Also, discussion with the relevant ministers of Norway touched an opportunity to supply passenger trains to Ukraine. Approaches to further cooperation on development of the border railway connection between Ukraine and Poland were agreed with the Deputy Minister of Infrastructure of Poland.
During URC2026, the Ukrainian delegation sought practical solutions for attracting locomotives to Ukraine with Andris Kulbergs, the Prime Minister of Latvia. Oleksii Balesta noted, now there are not so many countries that have locomotives for our track width in sufficient quantities.
There were no more expectations
Alyona Shkrum, the First Deputy Minister of Community and Territorial Development of Ukraine, summing up the Conference on the Restoration of Ukraine, held the following speech: “It is good that Gdansk was not canceled”.
She noted the fact of signing an agreement with EIB, which “we were working towards for a year”, and in the framework whereof “funds for water and restoration of logistics” will be provided. She also explained what has been prescribed by that the Memorandum of Understanding on Security and Connectivity Initiative, signed between the Government of Ukraine, the European Commission and EIB. Alyona Shkrum noted, it lays foundation for financing 4 sectors of the country: infrastructure, transport, power supply and digital infrastructure. It also paves the way for 120 million EUR for border infrastructure and funds for restoration of transport and communications.
The Deputy Minister also announced that in the framework of URC2026 the first contributions of countries to the Transport Support Fund were obtained for restoration of transport.
Viktor Dovgan, ex-Deputy Minister of Infrastructure for European Integration, still staying in Gdansk, gave the CTS a quick comment on how he assessed the Recovery Conference held this year.
He noted, there were no special expectations from this event: “Just a month ago, at the pre-URC in Rzeszów, it was clear that the Ukrainian topic was becoming toxic for Polish politicians. The plans announced in Rome to sign loan and grant agreements aimed at reconstruction of large projects were not implemented. In fact, work on the agreement, based on the principle of the 2016 loan agreement (it provided 100 million EUR for development of checkpoints), whereunder Polish companies would have to participate in tenders and to build something here, ceased in May at the ministerial level. No one from the Polish side wanted to take this loan”.
Viktor Dovgan added, the story with Mr. Navrotsky and the White Eagle developed later, after a certain coolness was felt during the preparation for URC2026. Ex-Deputy Minister highlighted, “Politicians feel the mood of their voters, even if they are not ultra-rightists. On the sidelines, they told us: how will we explain to a Polish voter that we are giving Ukraine money on credit? In fact, only Polish companies that were counting on privileged financing lose from this”.
Viktor Dovhan sums up URC2026, “There are friendly relations, good meetings, dinners, brotherhood… but there are no specifics. In my opinion, Rome was more specific. There were higher expectations. In Rome, Poland announced 40 mechanisms to promote exports to Ukraine in the framework of the Team Poland for Ukraine project. It concerned both grants and loans – albeit small ones, from 200 thousand EUR, but it demonstrated drive. As the result, there is nothing… But what should we do? This is the decision of their politicians. We remain friends, we are going to Kyiv and we hope to see everyone next year in Tallinn”.
In a less political and more practical way
On Friday afternoon, the Reconstruction Agency spoke in more detail about three agreements regarding its projects entered into at URC 2026.
In particular, they explained that the financial agreement (Tranche B) for 96 million EUR has been provided in the framework of the project Improvement of Motorway Networks in the framework of the EU initiative Solidarity Roads.
They also announced a grant agreement for 50.05 million EUR in the framework of the projects Transport Communication in Ukraine – Phase I and Transport Communication in Ukraine – Phase II and III.
The official statement says, “These agreements will provide financing for projects to be launched by the Reconstruction Agency, including, in particular, construction of transport interchanges in Kyiv region and capital repair of public roads of state importance in Lviv, Rivne and Kyiv regions”.
They confirmed that, according to the Memorandum of Understanding on the Security and Connectivity Initiative between the Government of Ukraine, the European Commission and EIB, a new agreement is being signed aimed to develop checkpoints and access roads. It will be implemented by the Reconstruction Agency in 2027-2029. Alyona Shkrum reported, total framework of the agreement will make up 120 million SUR. However, the Development Agency noted that first tranche amounting to 60 million EUR has already been agreed. Yuliia Sirko, the First Deputy Chairman of the Supreme Council Committee on Transport and Infrastructure, noted that after political speeches in the official part, the conference in Gdansk has shifted to a less political and more practical direction. She commented, “All hope is in negotiations between businesses and private investors”.

The Register of Damage for Ukraine has officially launched the first categories of claims for compensation for damage caused by the aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine for Legal Entities and the State of Ukraine:
This is a fundamentally new stage in the work of the Register. For the first time, the opening of Claims categories enables the recording of not only individual losses, but also systemic economic losses sustained by business entities and by the State of Ukraine as a result of the aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine.
It concerns a different scale and a different dimension of the consequences of the war – the destruction of infrastructure, the loss of production capacities and assets, the disruption of logistic chains, and the interference with the functioning of entire sectors of the economy.
Claims in C categories can be submitted by any legal persons, regardless of the organisational and legal form and form of ownership, including state and municipal enterprises.
Categories B of claims are available for the State of Ukraine, state authorities, state institutions, local-self-governments, communities, municipalities etc.
In categories related to infrastructure (B1.1 and C1.1 – critical infrastructure, B1.2 and C1.2 – non-critical infrastructure), claims may be submitted for compensation for the value of destroyed or damaged property, as well as for the costs of repairs or restoration (including future costs) of damaged infrastructure or its functions.
Category of claim C3.1 covers damage, destruction or loss of assets, loss of profits from such assets, total loss of business or other direct costs associated with such losses.
Claims that meet the eligibility requirements will be recorded in the Register and subsequently transmitted to the future Claims Commission, which will determine the amount of compensation due.
In December 2025, 35 States and the European Union signed the Convention on the Establishment of an International Claims Commission under the auspices of the Council of Europe.
The opening of these categories creates the opportunity to systemically document such losses and to form a complete international evidentiary base, on the basis of which decisions on compensation will be made.
How to Submit Claims
Claims are submitted via the Diia web portal. Claims on behalf of a legal person or a state authority may be submitted by the head of the legal person (for example, director or chairperson). The director or chairperson may also appoint a Representative, who will be authorised to submit claims on behalf of the legal person by granting such Representative Digital Powers via Diia. Any legally capable individual may act as a Representative.
B1.1, B1.2, C1.1, C1.2Damage or Destruction of Critical and Non-Critical Infrastructure:
C3.1 Damage, Destruction or Loss of Assets:
To learn more and submit a claim, visit the Register’s website.

Contents
Modern Ukrainian business is all about constant challenges, new approaches to company development and increasing competitiveness in both the Ukrainian and international markets. One way to strengthen international expertise in a company is to attract foreign specialists. Let’s look at the details and specifics of attracting such specialists.
01 — Employment of a Foreigner Under a Labour Agreement: What are the Peculiarities?
Generally, the labour relations of foreign citizens in Ukraine are regulated by the laws of Ukraine[1]1, specifically the Law of Ukraine “On Employment of the Population” (hereinafter referred to as “the Law”).
Indeed, the Law establishes a specific procedure that precedes the conclusion of a labour agreement (contract) with a foreigner.
First and foremost, to employ a foreigner, it is necessary to determine the legal status of the potential employee. Certain categories of foreigners are entitled to work under the same conditions as citizens of Ukraine:
If the foreigner does not belong to the mentioned categories, the employer must obtain a permit for the employment of foreigners (hereinafter referred to as “the Permit”).
To obtain the Permit, it is necessary to submit an application to the territorial body of the State Employment Service(employment center) (the application form is approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated January 24, 2023, No. 68).
If the candidate is a citizen of the russian federation, the republic of belarus or other countries recognized as posing a threat to the national security of Ukraine, the Security Service of Ukraine is involved in the consideration of the Permit issuance.
The Permit can be issued for different periods of time, depending on the duration of the labour agreement and the potential employee’s plans to remain at the specified place of work.
It is important to consider that the Permit is tied to a specific employer, meaning that if the foreigner changes their place of work, the new employer must undergo the procedure for obtaining the Permit from scratch.
For a foreigner’s arrival in Ukraine for employment, there are several methods:
02 — Concluding a Civil Law Agreement with a Foreigner: Are there differences from a Labour Contract?
If there are no actual labour relations between a foreigner and a company in Ukraine, meaning the foreigner is engaged to provide services as needed or to perform a specific task, a mechanism exists for concluding a civil law agreementwith them.
As a result of concluding such an agreement, labour relations do not arise between the parties, therefore, no work permit is required. A company that enters into a civil law agreement with a foreigner for the provision of services must comply with the requirements of civil legislation typically applied to contracts. In such an agreement it is important to specify exactly what service the counterparty will provide, what the result of such a service should be, and the amount of payment under the agreement.
It is crucial to avoid provisions similar to those found in labour contracts, such as specifying a work schedule, terms for granting vacation or sick leave, compensation, etc. That is, in the case of a civil law agreement, the company pays for the result of the services provided, rather than for the process of performing the work, as occurs with a labour contract.
However, it is worth noting that the existence of a service agreement does not grant a foreigner the right to cross the border. Therefore, it can only be concluded with a foreigner who is already legally residing in Ukraine, or if a foreigner residing abroad can be engaged to provide services in a remote format.
03 — Signing a Gig-Contract with a Foreigner: When is it applied?
An effective mechanism today for engaging IT specialists to work in Ukraine is the conclusion of gig-contracts, as provided for by the Law of Ukraine “On Stimulating the Development of the Digital Economy in Ukraine”.
Such contracts can be concluded with foreigners only by Diia City residents. At the same time, the status of a Diia City resident can only be obtained by a legal entity registered under the laws of Ukraine that carries out one or more types of activities provided for by the Law “On Stimulating the Development of the Digital Economy in Ukraine”.
The customer under a gig-contract must be a Diia City resident, and the contractor or performer must be a gig-specialist – this can include a foreigner.
It is important to note that for working with a foreigner through a gig-contract, the company must also obtain the Permit.
Thus, concluding a gig-contract with a foreigner is possible only for Diia City resident companies and is not applicable to any other entity; therefore, only a limited circle of companies can consider this method of engaging foreign specialists.
04 — Conclusion
For Ukrainian companies there are three primary mechanisms for engaging foreign specialists: concluding civil law agreements, labour agreements (contracts) and gig-contracts. The choice of a specific method depends on the nature of the relationship between the company and the specialist, as well as the purpose of their engagement.
Engaging foreigners helps partially resolve the problem of personnel shortages, allows for the acquisition of valuable expertise and introduces new approaches to work. This also contributes to increasing the competitiveness of Ukrainian companies in both domestic and international markets and is an essential element of modern labour relations in the context of globalization.
[1] Article 54 of the Law of Ukraine “On International Private Law”
Source: How to legally formalise the recruitment of foreign specialists to Ukrainian companies? – Lexology

During March and April 2026, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine adopted a series of decisions aimed at simplifying the procurement of innovative defence products by the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine, harmonising the management of intellectual property rights in the military-industrial complex (MIC), and introducing new formats for technological cooperation in the field of AI.
In our previous publication, “Ukraine simplifies the codification of military products and accelerates the contracting of newly developed systems”, we analysed the reform of the codification procedure for armaments and military equipment, as well as the simplification of the supply of products for the needs of Ukraine’s Defence Forces.
1. The Ministry of Defence is empowered to procure innovative weapons for testing under a simplified procedure
The Cabinet of Ministers has launched a pilot project that creates the legal basis for the systematic procurement of innovative defence products with a view to testing them in real combat conditions.
Previously, no procedure existed that would allow the Ministry of Defence to procure innovations for troops to test. Samples of innovative solutions reached units in an unsystematic manner, without a structured mechanism for assessing performance or scaling up successful designs.
The pilot project introduces the concept of “defence innovation product” – a new or improved sample of weaponry, military or special equipment, with no analogues in service and offering improved tactical-technical or qualitative characteristics. Such products may be procured by the Ministry of Defence under a simplified procedure and transferred to designated units for experimental combat use.
Following experimental combat use, the sample is assessed for compliance (or non-compliance) with the declared tactical-technical, qualitative and other characteristics, and for its ability to address operational issues and challenges within the Defence Forces.
Where experimental combat use is successful, the Ministry of Defence will ensure the rollout of the defence innovation product across the Defence Forces, including its inclusion in procurement lists and volumes and, where required, its codification.
2. Unified rules for managing intellectual property in the MIC
On 10 April 2026, the Cabinet of Ministers approved the Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Ukraine’s Military-Industrial Complex (the “Policy”), which formalises the approach of the public sector (state customers and state-owned enterprises) to the management of its own intellectual property in the MIC and reduces legal uncertainty for private counterparties.
In particular, the Policy proceeds from the premise that state customers and MIC enterprises must contractually regulate compliance with IP legislation in their agreements with private counterparties.
The Policy’s objectives are to be achieved by state customers and enterprises through, among other things:
A key element of the Policy is the creation of a “Unified Information System for Research and Development Works, Results of Intellectual Activity and Technologies for Military and Dual-Use Purposes, and Design Documentation for Military Products”. The system will function as a shared repository for state customers and MIC enterprises, with centralised state management exercised through the Ministry of Defence.
3. Ukraine becomes the first country to open access to AI model training on real combat data
The Cabinet of Ministers has launched a pilot project granting Ukrainian companies and foreign defence agencies access to the Ministry of Defence’s AI platform. The platform is built on real battlefield data and is intended to support the development of military products that use AI.
As the rights holder and project coordinator, the Ministry of Defence may grant access to the data, in particular for training AI models, verifying the compatibility of technologies, and developing new or improving existing military products that use AI. Access is provided through a dedicated platform built on the basis of the Ministry of Defence’s Centre for Innovation and Development of Defence Technologies.
Ukrainian companies interested in using the platform must meet one of the following criteria:
Foreign defence agencies may obtain access under international treaties or separate agreements on the provision of access to software products. The Ministry of Defence decides on the terms of payment for access by foreign partners on a case-by-case basis. For Ukrainian companies, access is free of charge.
For the purposes of the project, the Ministry of Defence may export military products without obtaining authorisation from the Cabinet of Ministers. The obligation to obtain a permit from the State Export Control Service of Ukraine, however, remains in force.
Conclusions
Taken together, these changes form a consistent strategy for stimulating the development of the MIC: accelerating the cycle from development to combat use, harmonising the management of IP rights, and opening up new forms of technological partnership — all on terms that protect Ukraine’s national security interests.
For companies operating in the MIC, and for international partners considering cooperation in defence technologies, these developments raise practical questions: how the new mechanisms apply to current or planned activities, whether existing contractual structures and arrangements meet the new requirements, and whether these changes create opportunities previously unavailable.
Source: Legal Digest: Developments in Ukraine’s Defence Sector (March – April 2026) – Sayenko Kharenko

On 29 April 2026, the Register of Damage for Ukraine (RD4U) opened new categories of claims for businesses regarding damage caused by the armed aggression of the Russian Federation. Below is a guide on who can file a claim, what documents are required, and how to proceed.
On 29 April 2026, the Register of Damage for Ukraine (RD4U) (the “Register“), established at the initiative of Ukraine, the European Union and 42 states, to facilitate compensation claims for damage caused by the armed aggression of the Russian Federation, announced the launch of new claim categories for businesses and the State of Ukraine.
Businesses are now eligible to officially submit claims for damage caused by armed aggression.
The newly introduced business claim categories include:
These categories are determined based on the type of property damaged or destroyed.
When can a claim be submitted?
The Register allows legal entities, regardless of ownership structure or institutional affiliation, to submit claims for material losses caused by the armed aggression starting from 24 February 2022.
The Register does not provide an exhaustive list of events giving rise to compensation claims. Eligible events may include direct military attacks, acts of sabotage, occupation, cyberattacks, supply chain disruptions, logistics interruptions, and similar consequences of the aggression.
Claims may be submitted in relation to:
The affected property must be located within Ukraine’s internationally recognised territory.
Claims may cover not only damage or destruction itself but also expenses already incurred for restoration or recovery of the property.
What documents should be prepared?
To successfully submit a compensation claim, businesses are advised to secure documentary evidence confirming the fact of the damage; the amount of losses incurred; and ownership or lawful possession of the damaged or destroyed property.
Both official (court decisions; law enforcement resolutions; reports issued by the State Emergency Service of Ukraine etc.) and unofficial evidence (media publications; photographs and videos; witness statements; and other supporting materials) may be used to substantiate damage caused by the armed aggression.
We recommend collecting as much supporting evidence as possible and not limiting submissions to formal official documents only.
The Register also does not establish a strict list of evidence regarding the amount claimed, provided the claim is properly substantiated. Supporting documents may include invoices, sale and purchase agreements, financial statements, contracts, and similar records.
At the same time, obtaining an independent expert assessment of losses is advisable, as it may help quantify both direct property damage and lost profits.
It should also be considered that only duly substantiated claims will be included in the Register, while the burden of proof and associated risks remain with the claimant legal entity.
How to submit a claim?
Claims are submitted electronically through the Ukraine’s state digital services portal, Diia, by logging in to user account and completing the relevant application form.
A claim may be submitted on behalf of a legal entity either by its director or by an authorised representative – any individual with full legal capacity. For this purpose, the Diia portal provides the “Digital Authorisation” service.
What happens next?
Following submission, the claim is reviewed by the Register’s Secretariat for formal compliance and then referred to the Register Board, which determines whether the claim is admissible for inclusion in the Register.
Although no specific review deadlines have been established, the Register Board holds in-person meetings at least once per quarter to consider submitted claims and decide whether to register or reject them.
Applicants are notified of the decision through the Diia web portal.
The Register and its governing bodies are not authorised to determine the amount of compensation or make compensation payments. These functions are expected to be assigned to separate institutions to be established in the future.
The opening of the Register to businesses is undoubtedly an important and significant step toward compensation for losses caused by the armed aggression. It demonstrates that an effective compensation mechanism is becoming increasingly tangible.
Source: International register of damage for Ukraine now open to businesses – Sayenko Kharenko

The Ukrainian Parliament is set to ratify a landmark agreement that establishes the legal framework for the Polish Development Bank – the Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego (BGK) – to operate fully in Ukraine. This move is designed to accelerate Ukraine’s recovery by providing a direct channel for financial and technical assistance to both public and private sector entities.
Key financial tools to be made available
BGK’s mandate will cover a broad range of instruments intended to reduce the friction of doing business in a wartime environment. These instruments include:
Wartime solutions: addressing business pain points
The agreement with BGK specifically targets the “bankability” of projects during martial law by addressing three critical hurdles:
De-risking for local banks
Local banks are often hesitant to take on performance or payment exposure during the war. The agreement will attempt to address bank de-risking in the following ways:
Currency convertibility & transfers
One of the largest constraints in wartime is the ability to convert the Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH) to hard currency and remit it abroad for debt service or supplier payments.
Streamlined procurement
Although standard public procurement can be slow, projects supported by BGK will follow its procurement procedures.
Business takeaways

For more information on Ukraine’s agreement with the BGK, contact your CMS client partner or the CMS experts who contributed to this article: Ihor Olekhov.

If Ukraine neither opens the market nor attracts global capital in 6-8 months, the world will build this industry without it.
Anton Melnyk, co-founder of the defense fund MITS Capital, announced it at the Radio NV event “Defense Industry 2026. Efficiency, Development, Scalability”.
He noted, “As one famous person said at the end of last year: Either we change or we perish. We have started to change a little bit and that’s good. But today I will say by myself: either we change quickly, here and now, or we will all perish again this year. We don’t have much time. In fact, we have just six months for our defense industry. Maximum eight months… we have not enough time”.
Mr. Melnyk said, foreign partners already have a head start. Co-founder of the defense fund MITS Capital added, “If they don’t come here, if they neither create joint ventures nor invest, they’ll just copy and do it themselves”, having emphasized that either we’ll tie them down or they’ll do it without us.
As for exports, Mr. Melnyk noted that technical problem of exports can be solved in hours. He highlighted, “It’s technically and administratively closed. It can also be technically and administratively open”, having noted that it doesn’t matter how it happens: either through the State Export Control Service of Ukraine or through Defence City. Co-founder of the defense fund stated, “It’s important that the system is as open as possible”.
He also highlighted that a closed market kills investment, “It’s not just about leftover production. It’s about startups and companies that have grown into manufacturers of components and technologies. They need investment stability”, having noted that if an investor sees a closed market, he will not invest.
Mr. Melnyk emphasized, “Now either superstar foreigners or patriotic Ukrainian funds are investing. But this is not systemic capital”.
He says that the Ukrainian defense industry needs three key resources: time, people and money. “There is no time. People still left. There is enough money worldwide, we need it but for this purpose we need a world market”.
Regarding defense technologies, Mr. Melnyk noted that Defense Tech will grow in the next 20 years and transform into robotics within 10 years. Ukraine has received a technological and entrepreneurial explosion. Co-founder of the defense fund MITS Capital warned, “This chance can be lost”.
Regarding global players in the worldwide defense industry market who are already copying Ukraine, he stated: “Partners come, look, copy. FPV, which they used to laugh at, is now being made by Americans and they are proud of it”, having emphasized that there is not enough time for this.
He also stated that a technological race is underway at the front. “The enemy is using drones-queens, strikes hundreds of kilometers away, Lancets. We see long-range strikes in the rear”.
Speaking about urgent decisions, he emphasized, “Decisions need to be made in the coming months. I hope Mykhailo Fedorov will speed up this process”. He also noted that even without actual exports, an open market changes the investment logic.
In respect of joint ventures, Melnyk highlighted: “NATO has a longstanding practice in joint ventures between the countries. We need to do the same, from small to large companies”.
Finally, co-founder of the defense fund emphasized, “The USA is closing the component market. China may limit supply of engines and magnets. If this happens, FPV may run out in three months. Therefore, we need to diversify engines, magnets, missiles, heavy equipment and others. We need a comprehensive military industry. We have no time. We need solutions now”.
Source: ОПК України — Критичні шість місяців для розвитку та інвестиційних рішень / NV

Today, on January 20, the German Power Company Notus Energy and American & Ukrainian Investment Company Horizon Capital signed the agreement on financing joint project aimed at construction of a wind farm in Odesa region with capacity of 124 MW. In addition, Horizon Capital announced initial closing of its Horizon Capital Catalyst Fund focused on reconstruction.
Both agreements were signed at the World Economic Forum in Davos in the presence of Oleksii Sobolev, the Minister of Economy, Environment and Agriculture of Ukraine.
Previously, Horizon Capital successfully launched the Horizon Capital Catalyst Fund (HCCF) aimed at supporting recovery and reconstruction of key sectors of the Ukrainian economy. At the first closing stage, the Fund attracted €152 million, i.e. over 50% of the target size equal to €300 million. In particular, the Fund focuses on sectors that are critical for reconstruction of the country and those that require significant private capital investments, namely energy, digital infrastructure and construction.
Now, jointly with announcement of the first closing, the Fund has completed structuring of its first investment –construction of a wind farm in Odesa region, being developed by the German energy company and developer Notus Energy.
Oleksii Sobolev noted, “I congratulate Horizon Capital and our partners – IFC, EBRD, Proparco, Swedfund, Norfund and FMO – on the first closing of Catalyst Fund. This is a signal to the world: we are not waiting for end of the war in order to rebuild the country. Strategic partnership with the German company Notus Energy is also important, in particular, when Ukraine lost over 60% of its generating capacity due to constant shelling. The presence of such large players in Ukraine shows that Ukraine is capable of attracting large international capital even in the wartime”.
Structure of the deal provides the following:
• Catalyst Fund receives 45% in the project and provides a corresponding share of equity for construction.
• Notus Energy holds a controlling stake and acts as the lead investor in the deal: it finances the remaining required equity and is liable for construction and further operation of the facility.
• Total project budget exceeds €220 million and provides a significant amount of debt financing from international IFIs and DFIs, including with EBRD, IFC, Swedfund, BIO and Green for Growth Fund (GGF). In particular, the project in Odesa region is the first of three wind farms in Notus Energy portfolio for Ukraine, with aggregate capacity of ca. 300 MW, as well as a part of broader portfolio of renewable energy development in Ukraine with capacity over 1.3 GW under the projects at various stages.